m-FILTER vs Active! gateSS Comparison: Everything You Need to Know Before Choosing

Explore a comprehensive comparison of m-FILTER and Active! gateSS to understand how they differ in features, pricing, category, and overall performance. Whether you're evaluating software for a small team or a growing enterprise, this guide helps you identify the solution that best aligns with your needs.

m-FILTER Vs Active! gateSS: Compare Features, Pricing & Overall Value

Compare Products
m-FILTER logo
m-FILTER

Email security system that helps entities and individuals secure their files and information sent or received via email.

Visit Site
Active! gateSS logo
Active! gateSS

Prevent accidental transmission of wrong emails!

Visit Site
General Information
Overview
m-FILTER enables organizations to prevent data breaches, archive entire email texts, block spam messages, and provide better email policies control to users, allowing safe and secure email access. It assists with anti-data theft and internal permissions management. The Mail Filter function lets businesses set rules for sending and receiving email, letting employees comply with company policy standards to prevent intentional or unintentional information loss from mistakenly sent emails. The Archive feature saves all incoming and outgoing emails, enables high-speed search detects fake/spam messages, enhances compliance, and more. The Anti-Spam feature uses a database continuously updated through real-time worldwide spam email monitoring.
Load More
Active! gateSS is a Japanese email security service from QUALITIA designed to prevent accidental transmission of emails to the wrong recipients, a leading cause of information leakage in Japanese organisations. Misaddressed emails, incorrect attachments and careless use of carbon copy fields can expose personal data and confidential business information, leading to regulatory, contractual and reputational consequences. Active! gateSS addresses this risk by intercepting outbound messages and applying checks and controls before they leave the organisation. Its approach combines user-level confirmation prompts with administrator-defined policies, creating a safety net that works regardless of which email client employees use and without requiring significant changes to existing workflows. As a cloud service, it can be introduced relatively quickly alongside platforms such as Microsoft 365 and Google Workspace. These safeguards are designed to reduce human error at the moment of sending, which is where most accidental disclosures actually occur in practice. Key capabilities include temporary holding of outgoing mail so senders can review and cancel messages, confirmation screens that highlight external recipients and attachments, and approval workflows that require a supervisor to authorise certain messages. Automatic conversion of multiple external recipients into blind carbon copy prevents address exposure in mass mailings, while attachment encryption and download-link delivery reduce the risk associated with sending files directly. Policy settings allow administrators to tailor rules by department, domain or content, and logs provide audit trails for compliance purposes. The product integrates at the mail gateway level and is operated in Japanese, reflecting its focus on the domestic market, where controls on erroneous transmission are a common governance requirement. Target customers include local governments, financial institutions, healthcare providers, manufacturers and other enterprises handling sensitive information. Pricing starts from around JPY 100,000 with a free trial; there is no permanently free version.
Load More
Pricing
Price
Not available
YEN 100000/Per Month
Free Trial
Not available
Available
Vendor Details
Vendor
Not available
Not available
Founded
Not available
Not available
Company Size
Not available
Not available
Locations
Not available
Not available
Social Media
Not available
Not available
Market & Platform Support
Industries
Not available
Not available
Customer Segments
Not available
Not available
Languages
Not available
Not available
Devices
Not available
Not available
Features
Encryption
Not available
Screenshots
1 / 2
1 / 2
Videos
No video available
No video available
Alternatives
More Comparisons

Not sure which software is right for your business?

Tell us about your requirements and we'll recommend the best software based on your business needs.

100% Free
Personalized Recommendations
Response within 24 Hours
Sponsorships

Frequently Asked Questions m-FILTER vs Active! gateSS

m-FILTER and Active! gateSS differ in their features, pricing, user experience, integrations, deployment options, and overall capabilities. The right choice depends on your business goals, team size, budget, and specific requirements. Compare both solutions side by side to understand which platform better fits your needs.

Sign up for our newsletter

Do you want to get notified when new software or services are added to Krowdbase? Sign up for our newsletter and stay ahead with the latest tools, providers, features, and updates.

By subscribing, you agree with Krowdbase. Terms & Conditions and Privacy Policy.
m-FILTER vs Active! gateSS Comparison | Features, Pricing & Reviews | Krowdbase